On the one hand, Andre's hand eye coordination, ability to take the ball on the rise, and absolutely destroy the ball on either wing in his prime makes a great case for him.
Yet re-watching their matches, I notice, especially from 95 on, Pete had the ability to generate more power on even his groundies far more effortlessly (ala Rogi), and he was a superb all court player, despite obviously being a rung behind Andre from the baseline. It goes without saying he was the better athlete.
We...
Who had more talent and potential, Andre or Pete?
Yet re-watching their matches, I notice, especially from 95 on, Pete had the ability to generate more power on even his groundies far more effortlessly (ala Rogi), and he was a superb all court player, despite obviously being a rung behind Andre from the baseline. It goes without saying he was the better athlete.
We...
Who had more talent and potential, Andre or Pete?